How the Conficker Problem Just Got Much Worse

April 5th, 2009 | by | security

Apr
05

On the surface, April 1 came and went without a peep from the dreaded Conficker megaworm. But security experts see a frightening reality, one where Conficker is now more powerful and more dangerous than ever.

In the first minute of April 1, Conficker did exactly what everyone knew it was going to do: It successfully phoned home for an update. And while it was fun to imagine what nasty payload that update may have included (it was fun, wasn’t it?), the result was not outwardly catastrophic; rather than a blueprint for world domination, the update contained instructions on how to dig in even deeper.

“The worm did exactly what everyone thought it was going to do, which is update itself,” security expert Dan Kaminsky, who helped develop a widely-used Conficker scanner in the days leading up to April 1, told us. “The world wants there to be fireworks, or some Ebola-class, computers-exploding-all-over-the-world event or God knows what, but the reality is…the Conficker developers have cemented their ability to push updates through any fences the good guys have managed to build in February and March.”

And here’s why that is deeply, deeply scary. As we explained, Conficker has built a zombie botnet infrastructure by registering hundreds of spam DNS names (askcw.com.ru, and the like), which it then links up and uses as nodes for infected machines to contact for instructions. In its earlier forms, Conficker attempted to register 250 such DNS names per day. But with the third version of the software, the Conficker.c variant which has been floating around for the last month or so, the number of spam DNS takeovers was boosted to 50,000 per day—a number security pros can no longer keep up with.

source

Yikes! This paints a pretty scary picture.

Comments Closed

Airline Security

June 3rd, 2008 | by | in the news

Jun
03

Are you freaking kidding me?

A man wearing a T-shirt depicting a cartoon character holding a gun was stopped from boarding a flight by the security at Heathrow’s Terminal 5.

Brad Jayakody, from Bayswater, central London, said he was “stumped” at the objection to his Transformers T-shirt.

Mr Jayakody said he had to change before boarding as security officers objected to the gun, held by the cartoon character.

Airport operator BAA said it was investigating the incident.

Mr Jayakody said the incident happened a few weeks ago, when he was challenged by an official during a pre-flight security check.

source

I’m not sure, but I think that we’ve lost our freaking minds if we’re worried that the Transformer on his shirt would suddenly become real and start raising hell on the plane.

Comments Closed

Air Marshals

March 28th, 2008 | by | security

Mar
28

Recently CNN ran an article called Air marshals missing from almost all flights.

In it they have stated that:

Of the 28,000 commercial airline flights that take to the skies on an average day in the United States, fewer than 1 percent are protected by on-board, armed federal air marshals, a nationwide CNN investigation has found.

SO WHAT?!?

Honestly, do we really think that our airport security has gotten that much better after 9/11. Its all show. It really is. They may catch some of the goofy stuff, but I’m willing to bet that if you wanted to you could get a weapon of some sort on board and attempt to take a plane.

Notice I said attempt.

We’re living in a day and age where we know what can happen when a plane is hijacked. Its not good. And no one, at least in the USA, will go out that way again.

At least, not without a fight.

And that’s exactly what will happen the next time someone tries to take a plane. Its going to be a street fight at 35,000 feet. Men, women, kids, grandparents, I don’t care who you are, you’re going to stand and fight. I’ve thought about it and I’m sure you have to. I know that if something goes down on my flight, I’m 6’1, 195 pounds of bad intentions coming after you down the aisle.

So does it really matter if we have any air marshals on the flights?

Comments Closed